I. Contributions in Journals and Books
Contributions in English:
Prochownik, K. M. (2021). The experimental philosophy of law: New ways, old questions, and how not to get lost. Philosophy Compass, 16(12), e12791.
Prochownik, K. “Big Gods” in ancient Mesopotamia: The cultural evolution of supernatural protectors (forthcoming). Journal of Cognitive Historiography.
Prochownik, K (forthcoming). Causation in the law, and experimental philosophy. In P. Willemsen & A. Wiegmann (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of causation . Bloomsbury.
Prochownik, K., Wiegmann, A., & Horvath, J. (2021). Blame blocking and expertise effects revisited. Proceedings of the 43th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2323-2329). Cognitive Science Society.
Prochownik, K., Krebs, M., Wiegmann, A., & Horvath, J. (2020). Not as bad as painted? Legal expertise, intentionality ascription, and outcome effects revisited. In S. Denison., M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B.C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1930-1936). Cognitive Science Society.
Prochownik, K., & Cushman, F. A. (2019). Outcomes speak louder than actions? Testing a challenge to the two-process model of moral judgment. In A.K. Goel, C.M. Seifert, & C. Freksa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2606-2612). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.
Prochownik, K. (2019). Gods and goodness by the rivers of Babylon: a cognitive scientific approach to ancient Mesopotamian moral theology. In T. Oshima & S. Kohlhaas (Eds.), Teaching morality in antiquity: wisdom texts, images, and oral traditions (pp. 265-287). Orientalische Religionen in der Antike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Prochownik, K., & Unterhuber, M. (2018). Does the blame blocking effect for assignments of punishment generalize to legal experts? In T.T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2285-2290), Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Prochownik, K. (2017). Do people with a legal background dually process? The role of causation, intentionality and pragmatic linguistic considerations in judgments of criminal responsibility. In J. Stelmach, B. Brożek & Ł. Kurek (Eds.), The province of jurisprudence naturalized (pp. 168-194). Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
Contributions in Polish:
Prochownik, K. (2012). “Geneza złożonych systemów społecznych w świetle teorii koewolucji genetyczno-kulturowej Petera Richersona i Roberta Boyda: analiza hipotezy instynktów plemiennych”/ The origins of complex social systems in the light of gene-culture coevolutionary theory by Peter Richerson and Robert Boyd: an analysis of the tribal instincts hypothesis. In Samonek, A. (Ed.), “Teoria prawa między nowoczesnością a ponowoczesnością”/ Theory of law in between modernity and postmodernity (pp. 63-75). Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Prochownik, K. (2012). “Normy i normatywność z perspektywy Social Instincts Theory. Zmagania natury i kultury”/ Norms and normativity from the perspective of Social Instincts Theory: The struggle between nature and nurture. In Juzaszek, M. (Ed.), “Prawo a kultura – kultura a prawo”/ Law and culture – culture and law (pp. 193-220). Krakow: At Group.
II. Commentaries
Prochownik, K. (2019). Three questions about the social function of reason. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 38(1), 77-85 (book symposium on “The Enigma of Reason. A New Theory of Human Understanding” by Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber).
White, C., Sousa P., & Prochownik, K. (2016). Explaining the success of karmic religions. Commentary on A. Norenzayan et al., The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 42-43.
Sousa., P., & Prochownik, K. (2014). Religion, prosociality, assortative sociality, and the evolution of large-scale cooperation: A few remarks on Martin & Wiebe. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 2 (1), 42-48. [Republished in Martin, L. H., and Wiebe, D. (Eds.), (2016). Conversations and controversies in the scientific study of religion: collaborative and co-authored essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe, pp. 174-180. Boston: Brill.]
Ingram, G., & Prochownik, K. (2014). Restrictive and dynamic conceptions of the unconscious: Perspectives from moral and developmental psychology. Commentary on B. R. Newell & D. R. Shanks, Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(01), 34–35.
III. Reviews
IV. Blogging
Blogposts at the International Cognition and Culture institute: